Compare / head-to-head

Grok 4.6vsMuse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. Muse Spark 1.3 is 1.5x cheaper per token. Muse Spark 1.3 has the larger context window (1.0M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
0 – 1
Muse Spark 1.3 leads
Cheaper per token
Muse Spark 1.3
1.5x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Muse Spark 1.3
1.0M tokens
Providers
2 providers
xAI · Meta
Grok 4.6
xAI · released 2026-08-12
textvision
Context
500K
Max out
—
Input /1M
$2 ↗
Output /1M
$6 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.5
Scores
15 · 5 core
Muse Spark 1.3
Meta · released 2026-09-02
textvisionvideo
Context
1.0M
Max out
—
Input /1M
$1.25 ↗
Output /1M
$4.25 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.15
Scores
10 · 0 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Muse Spark 1.3ΔEdge
Reported by both · 1
DeepSWE v1.165.9% ↗75.4% ↗-9.5 ptMuse Spark 1.3
Only Grok 4.6 reports · 14
GPQA Diamond94% ↗epochnot reported——
AA-Briefcase1577 ↗not reported——
APEX-Agents57.5% ↗not reported——
APEX-SWE56.4% ↗not reported——
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index61 ↗not reported——
CursorBench 3.269.9% ↗not reported——
FrontierCode v1.1 (Extended)61.3% ↗not reported——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)31.7% ↗epochnot reported——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)66% ↗epochnot reported——
GDPVal-AA v21753 ↗not reported——
Harvey LAB (Vals)15.8% ↗not reported——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)99.2% ↗epochnot reported——
SimpleQA Verified49.3% ↗epochnot reported——
Terminal-Bench 3.026% ↗not reported——
Only Muse Spark 1.3 reports · 9
AutomationBenchnot reported49.6% ↗——
DeepSearchQAnot reported90.3% ↗——
GDPval-AA v2not reported1754 ↗——
JobBenchnot reported64.9% ↗——
MRCR 256K-512Knot reported98.5% ↗——
MRCR 512K-1Mnot reported98.1% ↗——
OSWorld 2.0 (partial)not reported66.9% ↗——
SWE-Atlas Codebase QnAnot reported59.4% ↗——
Terminal-Bench 2.1not reported88.8% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Grok 4.6 minus Muse Spark 1.3 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGrok 4.6Muse Spark 1.3Edge
Context window500K tokens1.0M tokensMuse Spark 1.3
Max output———
Input price / 1M$2 ↗$1.25 ↗Muse Spark 1.3
Output price / 1M$6 ↗$4.25 ↗Muse Spark 1.3
Cached input / 1M$0.5 ↗$0.15 ↗Muse Spark 1.3
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$8$5.5Muse Spark 1.3
Modalitiestext · visiontext · vision · videoMuse Spark 1.3
Released2026-08-122026-09-02—
Cited benchmark scores1510—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

Grok 4.6 vs …

More matchups

Muse Spark 1.3 vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Grok 4.6 and Muse Spark 1.3 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.